From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Rework the pg_statistic_ext catalog |
Date: | 2019-06-16 17:52:03 |
Message-ID: | 6390.1560707523@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> writes:
>> This theory is insufficient to explain why Coelho's animals failed,
>> though. Maybe it would, if you also posit a ccache screwup? But it's
>> not obvious from their configurations that they're using ccache at all.
> Indeed, no ccache. The compilers change often (well, once a week), I do
> not want anything kept across compiler versions. The animals are really
> testing the compilers as much as they are testing postgres.
> However, there is an autoconf cache, but I do not see why it would have
> such an effect.
> So no clue.
And now they're both green again, so even less clue. Oh well.
On another day I'd be interested to understand exactly what happened
there, but right now I lack the time or energy to look closer.
(I do still have a suspicion that it was somehow caused by the
catversion bumps ...)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-06-16 18:02:35 | pgsql: Doc: remove description of commit 23bd3cec6 from v12 release not |
Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2019-06-16 17:45:45 | Re: pgsql: Rework the pg_statistic_ext catalog |