Can we bring some organization to the configure options list?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Can we bring some organization to the configure options list?
Date: 2019-06-07 14:22:49
Message-ID: 6384.1559917369@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

I was just noticing, while answering a user question, the amount of
unorganized urban sprawl we've accumulated in

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/install-procedure.html

We've got practically-essential options like --prefix and
--with-openssl intermixed with obscure portability flags
and options that only developers should take any interest in.
For bonus points, the ordering seems chosen largely by dartboard;
there's certainly no visible plan to it.

I think we should try to improve the situation by dividing the
configure options into categories and/or separating commonly
used options from obscure ones. I don't have any concrete
proposal to make right now, but I am hoping to kick off a
discussion about what such an organization would look like.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-06-09 14:55:16 Re: Unexplained createdb mydb response
Previous Message Debjani Chatterjee 2019-06-06 17:22:00 GSOD - Technical Writer