Re: Last minute mini-proposal (I know, I know)forPQexecf()

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Last minute mini-proposal (I know, I know)forPQexecf()
Date: 2007-04-01 06:52:49
Message-ID: 6368.1175410369@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

<korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> It's important to get the *right* interface into the first release
>> that has it.

> Agreed, that's why I proposed the right interface to begin with :-)

I don't necessarily object to PQexecf() as a shortcut for some
multi-step operation, but I don't think you've got the format string
semantics down yet.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2007-04-01 07:27:46 Logging checkpoints and other slowdown causes
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2007-04-01 02:47:21 Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?