| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dan Shea <dan(dot)shea(at)ec(dot)gc(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: View is not using a table index |
| Date: | 2007-04-24 18:09:36 |
| Message-ID: | 6365.1177438176@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
Dan Shea <dan(dot)shea(at)ec(dot)gc(dot)ca> writes:
> You make it sound so easy. Our database size is at 308 GB.
Well, if you can't update major versions that's understandable; that's
why we're still maintaining the old branches. But there is no excuse
for not running a reasonably recent sub-release within your branch.
Read the release notes, and consider what you will say if one of the
several data-loss-causing bugs that were fixed long ago eats your DB:
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/release.html
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alan Hodgson | 2007-04-24 18:16:03 | Re: WAL files, warm spares and minor versions |
| Previous Message | Andreas Kostyrka | 2007-04-24 18:03:57 | Re: View is not using a table index |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Carlos Moreno | 2007-04-24 21:13:59 | Re: View is not using a table index |
| Previous Message | Andreas Kostyrka | 2007-04-24 18:03:57 | Re: View is not using a table index |