From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Reifenberger <root(at)nihil(dot)plaut(dot)de> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Timespan_div misbehaving? |
Date: | 1999-03-08 15:21:29 |
Message-ID: | 6342.920906489@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Reifenberger <root(at)nihil(dot)plaut(dot)de> writes:
> catalog/local1_template1.bki.source:insert OID = 1585 ( "/" PGUID 0 b t f 1186
> 1186 1186 0 0 0 0 timespan_div - - )
> OR are the three 1186's wrong?
> Shouldn't at least the second input type be 701?
I think you are right --- the only timespan_div I can find in the source
code is TimeSpan *timespan_div(TimeSpan *span1, float8 *arg2) in adt/dt.c.
It looks like the entry for it in pg_proc is right, but the one in
pg_operator is wrong.
Hmm, a whole new class of cross-checks that opr_sanity ought to make ;-)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 1999-03-08 15:32:04 | Re: [HACKERS] What's happened with 1942 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-03-08 14:39:05 | Re: [HACKERS] palloc.h again |