Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl> writes:
> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 10:09:23AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Please review the archived discussions about reimplementing NOTIFY using
>> only shared memory, no tables.
> Maybe this can be done using two SLRU areas like we did for multixact.
If you are looking for an existing tool to adapt, I think the sinval
messaging mechanism is a FAR better prototype.
regards, tom lane