From: | Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name> |
---|---|
To: | Jonathan Lemig <jtlemig(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Views "missing" from information_schema.view_table_usage |
Date: | 2022-12-02 22:08:11 |
Message-ID: | 63158593.42022.1670018891326@office.mailbox.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-general |
> On 02/12/2022 22:33 CET Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name> wrote:
>
>
> > On 02/12/2022 21:51 CET Jonathan Lemig <jtlemig(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Has anybody ever encountered this, and if so, did you find a resolution?
> > Or perhaps there other limitations with the VTU that I'm unaware of?
>
> Is the one view you cannot find in view_table_usage a materialized view?
> Because those are not covered by view_table_usage[1].
>
> [1] https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=src/backend/catalog/information_schema.sql;h=18725a02d1fb6ffda3d218033b972a0ff23aac3b;hb=HEAD#l2605
Never mind. I forgot that you wrote that it appears in pg_views. So it's a plain view.
--
Erik
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Erik Wienhold | 2022-12-02 22:14:05 | Re: Views "missing" from information_schema.view_table_usage |
Previous Message | Jonathan Lemig | 2022-12-02 21:55:46 | Re: Views "missing" from information_schema.view_table_usage |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Erik Wienhold | 2022-12-02 22:14:05 | Re: Views "missing" from information_schema.view_table_usage |
Previous Message | Jonathan Lemig | 2022-12-02 21:55:46 | Re: Views "missing" from information_schema.view_table_usage |