Re: Physical replication slot advance is not persistent

From: Alexey Kondratov <a(dot)kondratov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
Subject: Re: Physical replication slot advance is not persistent
Date: 2020-01-31 11:14:03
Message-ID: 63078fc8-709d-39df-e763-478cf4ed8b38@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 30.01.2020 05:19, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 05:10:20PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
>> Looks perfect.
> Thanks Horiguchi-san and others. Applied and back-patched down to
> 11.

Great! Thanks for getting this done.

--
Alexey Kondratov

Postgres Professional https://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2020-01-31 11:17:51 Re: Duplicated LSN in ReorderBuffer
Previous Message vignesh C 2020-01-31 11:13:07 Re: pg_restore crash when there is a failure before all child process is created