From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)berkus(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Assembling "top features" list for beta announcement |
Date: | 2017-04-07 16:52:58 |
Message-ID: | 62fb6812-c9f9-936a-2f1b-415bb232804e@berkus.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 04/07/2017 09:47 AM, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 7 Apr 2017, at 17:39, Josh Berkus <josh(at)berkus(dot)org> wrote:
>> Folks:
>>
>> While 10 isn't 100% baked yet, I'd like to get started sorting out what
>> our "top 2-4" features for the beta announcement are going to be.
>> Traditionally, we've mentioned two to four features in detail, together
>> with a bullet list of other significant features. With the help of PVH,
>> here's what I have so far:
>>
>> Banner features:
>>
>> - pglogical logical replication
>> - table partitions in core
>>
>> Significant features:
>>
>> - XMLTABLE query expressions
>> - hash indexes in wal
>> - PGFDW: push down aggregates
>>
>> It looks like quorum sync rep won't make it, correct?
>>
>> Notable note: pg_xlog => pg_wal
>>
>> So .., please add to the above lists. Thanks!
>
> Would any of these be suitable for using "pretty graphics" with?
>
> eg for illustrating potential change in query time/database load/etc
>
> Purely for making things easier for readers to grok that is. :)
>
I'd save that for the final release announcement, but if you're prepared
to do graphics, the new partitioning might be a good candidate.
--
Josh Berkus
Containers & Databases Oh My!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Clift | 2017-04-07 17:00:39 | Re: Assembling "top features" list for beta announcement |
Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2017-04-07 16:47:00 | Re: Assembling "top features" list for beta announcement |