From: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Towards easier AMs: Cleaning up inappropriate use of name "relkind" |
Date: | 2020-07-11 16:23:34 |
Message-ID: | 62DA66FA-2C77-4DC3-84B2-484DD49E6649@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Jul 10, 2020, at 9:44 PM, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 10:00:47PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> There are two patches on this thread v2-0001 being much smaller than
>> v2-0002. I have looked at 0001 for now, and, like Alvaro, this
>> renaming makes sense to me. Those commands work on objects that are
>> relkinds, except for one OBJECT_TYPE. So, let's get 0001 patch
>> merged. Any objections from others?
>
> I have been through this one again and applied it as cc35d89.
> --
> Michael
Thanks for committing!
—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2020-07-11 16:49:43 | Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk |
Previous Message | Dmitry Dolgov | 2020-07-11 16:21:03 | Re: Index Skip Scan (new UniqueKeys) |