Re: Towards easier AMs: Cleaning up inappropriate use of name "relkind"

From: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Towards easier AMs: Cleaning up inappropriate use of name "relkind"
Date: 2020-07-11 16:23:34
Message-ID: 62DA66FA-2C77-4DC3-84B2-484DD49E6649@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Jul 10, 2020, at 9:44 PM, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 10:00:47PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> There are two patches on this thread v2-0001 being much smaller than
>> v2-0002. I have looked at 0001 for now, and, like Alvaro, this
>> renaming makes sense to me. Those commands work on objects that are
>> relkinds, except for one OBJECT_TYPE. So, let's get 0001 patch
>> merged. Any objections from others?
>
> I have been through this one again and applied it as cc35d89.
> --
> Michael

Thanks for committing!


Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2020-07-11 16:49:43 Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk
Previous Message Dmitry Dolgov 2020-07-11 16:21:03 Re: Index Skip Scan (new UniqueKeys)