| From: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Uma Krishnan" <ukris03(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres SQL Parser |
| Date: | 2007-04-22 23:14:19 |
| Message-ID: | 62988.75.177.135.163.1177283659.squirrel@www.dunslane.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Uma Krishnan wrote:
> Hello I'm trying to implement a new SortMerge algorithm, and see how it
> compares with the current algorithm. In doing so, rather than using
> select, I'd like to introduce a new verb so that Select is not modified.
>
> I looked at the source code, but could find the place where Postgres SQL
> grammer is defined.
>
src/backend/parser/gram.y
If you intend this work to be incorporated into PostgreSQL you should
discuss it first on this list, before you cut a single line of code - the
bar for new verbs is likely to be set fairly high.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-04-22 23:45:26 | Re: Postgres SQL Parser |
| Previous Message | Uma Krishnan | 2007-04-22 23:12:31 | Postgres SQL Parser |