"Kevin Grittner" <kgrittn(at)mail(dot)com> writes:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Either way, I don't much like overloading the use of LOAD, which
>> already has a very different meaning.
> Well, it's hard to avoid creating new keywords without overloading
> the meaning of exsiting ones.
FWIW, I'd much rather see us overload LOAD (which is seldom used)
than REPLACE (which might in the future become a widely-used DML
command).
regards, tom lane