Re: Thoughts on 7.3b3 in production?

From: evertcarton(at)netscape(dot)net (Evert Carton)
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Thoughts on 7.3b3 in production?
Date: 2002-10-28 23:57:43
Message-ID: 62726f43.0210281557.55587101@posting.google.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I've been playing with the APIs (especially C) for creating functions:

That alone is a reason for me to use it ...

Evert

Lee Harr <missive(at)frontiernet(dot)net> wrote in message news:<apcgqo$arv$1(at)news(dot)hub(dot)org>...
> In article <ap89ns$2egh$1(at)news(dot)hub(dot)org>, Brett Elliott wrote:
> > I have heard that Postgres betas are relatively stable so is it
> > safe to assume that 7.3b2 could be used reliably in production?
>
>
> It is a beta. If the developers believed it were production
> quality, it would be released.
>
> Definitely not recommended.
>
> > Any known issues with the beta?
> >
>
> If you would like to see the issues they are working on, you can
> track the [HACKERS] list. It is quite interesting.
>
>
> > Also, what does 7.3b2 offer that 7.2.3 doesn't have? Much better
> > performance?
> >
>
> I am sure performance has improved, and it is possible that there
> are particular cases where it is "much better" but I doubt that
> there has been any revolutionary performance improvement overall.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-29 00:45:10 Re: VACUUM FULL not working with persistent connections in
Previous Message Evert Carton 2002-10-28 23:53:07 Re: LDAP authentication