Re: Docs for pg_basebackup needs v17 note for incremental backup

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Docs for pg_basebackup needs v17 note for incremental backup
Date: 2025-02-06 13:07:37
Message-ID: 626823fa-441e-4c48-ae99-d1524f2a7bb6@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2025-02-05 We 7:59 PM, David G. Johnston wrote:
> Is there seriously not a single person in the past three weeks who has
> seen this and not had the minute to spare to say "yes, this should be
> documented"?
>
> David J.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 8:13 PM David G. Johnston
> <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hackers,
>
> Should the following paragraph in the docs be modified to point
> out minimum server version of v17 for incremental backups?
>
> pg_basebackup works with servers of the same or an older major
> version, down to 9.1. However, WAL streaming mode (|-X stream|)
> only works with server version 9.3 and later, and tar format
> (|--format=tar|) only works with server version 9.5 and later.
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/app-pgbasebackup.html
>
> David J.
>

(Please don't top-post, even on yourself)

People get busy. For example, many prominent hackers spent most of the
last week at various conferences. There are also other things happening
less publicly that are claiming people's time.

FWIW, I think that this should probably be documented.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2025-02-06 13:23:33 Re: SLRU_PAGES_PER_SEGMENT as configure parameter
Previous Message vignesh C 2025-02-06 13:03:11 Re: Virtual generated columns