Re: second DML operation fails with updatable cursor

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dharmendra Goyal <dharmendra(dot)goyal(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: second DML operation fails with updatable cursor
Date: 2007-10-25 04:31:17
Message-ID: 6262.1193286677@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> I am not adding anything from this thread to the patches_hold queue or
> the TODO list, right? We are just going to wait to get reports from the
> field?

Yeah, I think it's "done until somebody complains".

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Wang 2007-10-25 05:14:51 Re: postgres under linux can't start because of postmaster.pid
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-10-25 01:56:54 Re: suitable text search configuration