| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING |
| Date: | 2009-10-08 18:52:55 |
| Message-ID: | 6258.1255027975@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> BTW what was the conclusion of the idea about having three separate
>> nodes Insert, Delete, Update instead of a single Dml node?
> If we stick with a single node type then I'd suggest calling it
> something like ModifyTable.
I'm starting to work on this patch now. After looking at it a bit,
it seems to me that keeping it as one node is probably marginally
preferable to making three nodes; but I still do not like the "Dml"
name. Does anyone have a problem with the ModifyTable suggestion,
or a better idea?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-10-08 18:56:57 | Re: Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-10-08 18:43:51 | Re: COPY enhancements |