| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Rod Taylor" <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Subject: | Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not? |
| Date: | 2005-10-07 18:26:13 |
| Message-ID: | 6257.1128709573@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
>> I could vote for:
>>
>> bool pg_query_cancel(int)
>>
>> backend_cancel or cancel_backend sounds like it should
>> terminate the entire backend like kill -TERM would do.
> IIRC, the original discussion had a possible pg_query_cancel(int)
> functoin that would cancel a query based on XID or something like that,
> and we wanted to differentiate from that. (No such function was ever
> created, but it was the reason, IIRC)
Right. Rod's suggestion is superficially more logical, but it doesn't
fit into the plans for future extension of the capability.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2005-10-07 18:29:59 | Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-07 18:22:50 | Re: GRANT/roles problem: grant is shown as from login role |