From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Regina Obe <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us>, Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Code of Conduct: Is it time? |
Date: | 2016-01-11 22:19:38 |
Message-ID: | 6255.1452550778@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Regina Obe <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us> wrote:
>> How would you feel about the original thread that started this.
>> https://github.com/opal/opal/issues/941
> I'm not interested in opal, and don't have time to read a thread
> with (when I looked) 374 messages, but if the gist of it is that
> they have a code of conduct that attempts to control the speech or
> actions of contributors outside of the venue of the lists or events
> of the project, count me as -1, regardless of how offensive I might
> find said speech or actions.
FWIW, I did read some of that thread, and the point that seemed to me
to possibly bring that situation within reach of a CoC was that the
contributor was posting offensive-to-some views from an account that
explicitly identified him as a core opal contributor. As such, it
wasn't totally unreasonable to see him as representing the project
in those statements.
(Note: I have not verified the facts of the matter, but this is what
was alleged in the thread.)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Karsten Hilbert | 2016-01-11 22:21:00 | Re: Code of Conduct: Is it time? (WIP CoC) |
Previous Message | FarjadFarid(ChkNet) | 2016-01-11 22:15:31 | Re: Code of Conduct: Is it time? (WIP CoC) |