Re: Code of Conduct: Is it time?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Regina Obe <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us>, Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Code of Conduct: Is it time?
Date: 2016-01-11 22:19:38
Message-ID: 6255.1452550778@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Regina Obe <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us> wrote:
>> How would you feel about the original thread that started this.
>> https://github.com/opal/opal/issues/941

> I'm not interested in opal, and don't have time to read a thread
> with (when I looked) 374 messages, but if the gist of it is that
> they have a code of conduct that attempts to control the speech or
> actions of contributors outside of the venue of the lists or events
> of the project, count me as -1, regardless of how offensive I might
> find said speech or actions.

FWIW, I did read some of that thread, and the point that seemed to me
to possibly bring that situation within reach of a CoC was that the
contributor was posting offensive-to-some views from an account that
explicitly identified him as a core opal contributor. As such, it
wasn't totally unreasonable to see him as representing the project
in those statements.

(Note: I have not verified the facts of the matter, but this is what
was alleged in the thread.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karsten Hilbert 2016-01-11 22:21:00 Re: Code of Conduct: Is it time? (WIP CoC)
Previous Message FarjadFarid(ChkNet) 2016-01-11 22:15:31 Re: Code of Conduct: Is it time? (WIP CoC)