From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, bugtraq(at)securityfocus(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords |
Date: | 2005-04-20 22:17:40 |
Message-ID: | 6250.1114035460@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> That's what I told him. I think his concern about pre-computed hashes
> is the only real issue, and give 'postgres' is usually the super-user, I
> can see someone pre-computing md5 postgres hashes and doing quick
> comparisons, perhaps as a root kit so you don't have to do the hashing
> yourself. I personally don't find that very compelling either.
Lessee ... we'll include a complete password hash table in a root kit,
which will be used at a point where we've already managed to read
pg_shadow but are somehow still lacking the ability to do anything else
we could want to the database ... nope, not very compelling.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-20 22:19:50 | Re: Problem with PITR recovery |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-20 22:13:33 | Re: Problem with PITR recovery |