From: | rodrigo(at)paripassu(dot)com(dot)br |
---|---|
To: | "Kevin Grittner" <kgrittn(at)mail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Too much clients connected to the PostgreSQL Database |
Date: | 2012-10-30 01:06:04 |
Message-ID: | 62351.189.101.235.92.1351559164.squirrel@webmail.paripassu.com.br |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
150 maxActive setting, but we have some low usage application getting direct db
connection(out of the pool).
The interesting is that the server suddently get a lot of connections and reach the
limit and then release them.
I'm willing to change to Tomcat 7 connection pool. We are using c3pO and apache ones,
maybe that's a problem.
Thank you,
Well,
> Rodrigo Pereira da Silva wrote:
>
>> We have about 10 web applications deployed in a Tomcat 7.0
>> accessing a Postgresql 9.1 database. We do use connection pooling.
>> We have the max_connections parameter set to 200 connections,
>> however, we are reaching the max connections sporadically(about 4
>> time/day).
>
> What is the pooler's maxActive setting? (It should be less than the
> PostgreSQL max_connections setting.)
>
> BTW, 200 seems alwfully high unless a *really* high end machine. Â You
> may have fewer timeouts if you avoid swamping the server with a
> "thundering herd" of requests.
>
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Number_Of_Database_Connections
>
> -Kevin
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Xiong He | 2012-10-30 01:42:34 | Re: Too much clients connected to the PostgreSQL Database |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2012-10-30 00:34:46 | Re: How to print application_name in log_line_prefix (using %a)? |