| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: getpid() function |
| Date: | 2002-08-04 02:19:36 |
| Message-ID: | 6235.1028427576@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> As I remember, most cases where people have recently been asking for
> backend pid were related to temp tables because they were named by pid.
Ah, good point.
> I don't think they are anymore. (?)
Check.
> We can do two things. We can either rename it to pg_backend_pid and
> move it to the statistics section in the docs, where the backend pids of
> all active backends are available, or remove my code additions and see
> if anyone asks for it in 7.3.
Let's take it out and wait to see if anyone really still wants it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Leland F. Jackson, CPA | 2002-08-04 02:27:55 | Re: Maintainability: is declaring serials as integers a problem? |
| Previous Message | Jean-Christian Imbeault | 2002-08-04 01:56:13 | Maintainability: is declaring serials as integers a problem? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-04 02:45:51 | Re: CLUSTER and indisclustered |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-04 02:15:26 | Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks |