Re: is it a bug ?

From: Zouari Fourat <fourat(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: is it a bug ?
Date: 2005-03-03 10:35:33
Message-ID: 621eda8a050303023545313b2d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

excuse me but i dont understand what should i do ?

On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:28:50 +0100, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > [ been expecting someone who knows more than me to step forward, but
> > ... ] What I think is happening here is that PG is expecting the
> > translated messages in your .po files to have the same encoding as
> > your database encoding, but they aren't. Can you convert the .po
> > files to match your preferred encoding?
>
> No, this again means that you have to have a consistent database
> encoding and LC_CTYPE. The gettext library will automatically convert
> between the original encoding in the file and the encoding at run time
> as declared by LC_CTYPE.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut
> http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-03-03 18:28:30 Re: is it a bug ?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-03-03 10:28:50 Re: is it a bug ?