Re: Extended unit

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Alban Hertroys <alban(at)magproductions(dot)nl>, Pailloncy Jean-Gerard <jg(at)rilk(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Extended unit
Date: 2005-01-25 19:31:40
Message-ID: 6204.1106681500@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> We're talking here about a database with indexes to speed up
> intersection tests for arbitrary polygons, extensions to handle
> encryption, full text indexing and even builtin XML support.

... none of which require any extensions to the core type system.

AFAICS this could easily be implemented as a user-defined type, along
the lines of

CREATE TYPE measurement AS (value double, units text);

and if you want to constrain a particular column to contain only one
value of units, use CHECK.

The argument that we should extend the type system for this would become
a lot more credible if there were a widely-used extension in existence
for it to prove that there's sufficient demand.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-01-25 19:34:16 Re: Recursive queries
Previous Message John DeSoi 2005-01-25 19:30:48 Re: EMBEDDED PostgreSQL