Re: Managing the community information stream

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> This is even better than our archives due to the problem that the
>> archives don't have links to messages crossing month boundaries. Have
>> you noticed that if you go to the archives, some discussions appear
>> truncated at a point, but you can go to the archive for the next month
>> and it continues there? I find that artifact somewhat annoying. The
>> bug report would continue receiving the CC'ed mails, so it would record
>> them all in a single place.

> Not crossing month boundaries is super-annoying.

Indeed, but that should be fixed. I can't imagine that one
presumably-fixable deficiency is grounds for changing our entire
discussion infrastructure. Or do you think we will find something
else that has no deficiencies of its own?

regards, tom lane