| From: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: missing ML messages |
| Date: | 2022-01-16 16:48:41 |
| Message-ID: | 61E44C69.4050302@anastigmatix.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 01/16/22 11:34, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/61C09C1D.5050702@anastigmatix.net
>>> *seeing that RFC 5322 3.6.4 permits more than one msg-id for in-reply-to,
>>> crosses fingers to see what PGLister will make of it*
>
> A first step would probably be to figure out *what* to do. The RFC
> basically appears to punt on the whole idea of what to do with
> multiple parents. I'm unsure what would be the best thing for pglister
> to do. Just pick the first entry and go with that? That would
> certainly be the easiest, but would it be correct?
I'm not sure whether the best metric is 'correct' or 'useful'.
I think that on the one occasion where I jumped through the hoops of
making my MUA produce a message with two in-reply-to IDs, it was in
the hope that might allow future readers of either archive thread
to find the message.
Regards,
-Chap
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2022-01-16 16:48:53 | Re: order of messages on www.p.o/list |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2022-01-16 16:34:24 | Re: missing ML messages |