From: | mohan(at)physics(dot)gmu(dot)edu |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | <torque-user(at)db(dot)apache(dot)org> |
Subject: | java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: 23 at java.lang.String.charAt(String.java:460) |
Date: | 2004-01-29 16:34:59 |
Message-ID: | 61999.138.88.163.115.1075394099.squirrel@physics.gmu.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc pgsql-sql |
Hi All
I am having the torque3.1.jar and postgresql-7.4. I have compiled the new
jdbc driver called as postgresql.jar and have placed it in the lib
directory from where the ant scripts catch the jars. Whenever i try to
access through torque
gestList = BaseGestlistPeer.doSelect(new Criteria());
this error arises
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: 23
at java.lang.String.charAt(String.java:460)
at org.postgresql.jdbc2.ResultSet.toTimestamp(ResultSet.java:1653)
at org.postgresql.jdbc2.ResultSet.getTimestamp(ResultSet.java:398)
I have searched all the lists and the answer i got is a jdbc driver issue.
Please let me know what i need to for getting around with this problem.
This happens only with this method in the whole application. But the same
method works when i did not use the new torque 3.1 and everything happens
smoothly.Please let me know if there is a way to configure jdbc with
torque or any other configuration issue for postgres you know might have
been creating this problem. I am having one heck of a night mare wid this
issue.
thanks
--Mohan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Achilleus Mantzios | 2004-01-29 16:50:41 | Re: java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index |
Previous Message | Felix Bollenbeck | 2004-01-29 15:57:21 | JDBC Driver not found |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Achilleus Mantzios | 2004-01-29 16:50:41 | Re: java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index |
Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2004-01-29 16:05:59 | Re: query not using index for descending records? |