| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za> |
| Cc: | t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size |
| Date: | 1999-08-25 14:32:31 |
| Message-ID: | 6198.935591551@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za> writes:
> The reason for the tag as to be able to return to the 6.5 release source
> code. It's production code, and should be accessible at least for the next
> couple of months.
> Was a tag created for 6.5.1? The object is to be able to check out any
> particular release, bugs and all, whenever we feel like it.
You can always do a checkout by date if you need to capture the state of
the cvs tree at some particular past time. Frozen tags are just a (very
inefficient) way of remembering specific past times that you think are
likely to be of interest.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 | 1999-08-25 14:33:02 | AW: [HACKERS] vacuum process size |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1999-08-25 14:19:21 | RE: [HACKERS] vacuum process size |