From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Philippe Lang" <philippe(dot)lang(at)attiksystem(dot)ch> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Which RPM for RH Linux ES 4? PGDB or RH? |
Date: | 2006-05-31 03:41:39 |
Message-ID: | 6183.1149046899@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Philippe Lang" <philippe(dot)lang(at)attiksystem(dot)ch> writes:
> I have to install PGSQL 7.4.13 under RH Linux Entreprise Server 4, and I can
> apparently use either the rpm "postgresql-XXXX-7.4.13-1PGDG.i686.rpm" from
> the Postgresql Development Group, or use the rpm
> "postgresql-XXXX-7.4.13-2.RHEL4.1.i386" from Redhat itself.
> What is the best to do?
They are the same thing to within measurement error ;-). Or at least,
if you find an important difference, feel free to tell off Devrim or me
respectively.
But I agree with Alan's point: if you are running RHEL at all, it's
probably because you want Red Hat support, and Red Hat won't support
RPMs not built by Red Hat.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alex Turner | 2006-05-31 04:42:30 | Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go? |
Previous Message | Chris Broussard | 2006-05-31 01:07:11 | Re: [HACKERS] Schema Limitations ? |