| From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Peter J(dot) Holzer" <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Connections on cluster not being logged |
| Date: | 2018-07-24 18:10:52 |
| Message-ID: | 6182be22-72d7-c7d9-c2fd-954add10babb@aklaver.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 07/24/2018 09:47 AM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> On 2018-07-24 06:46:18 -0700, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>> On 07/24/2018 06:25 AM, Sandy Becker wrote:
>>> There is only one set of logs since it's a hardware cluster. The two
>>> nodes share the underlying database storage. Not sure why, but when the
>>
>> The community Postgres can't do that, have two instances share the same data
>> storage, at least AFAIK. So are you using some fork of Postgres or are there
>> actually two data directories?
>
> Maybe Postgresql only runs on the active node? I.e. a classic failover
> cluster.
Yeah, the OP emailed me off-list saying just that. My suspicion, they
where looking at log for inactive node.
>
> (I'm still not sure what a "hardware cluster" is. Probably some kind of
> appliance which packages two nodes, some storage and the HA software.)
>
> hp
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2018-07-24 18:17:14 | Re: Speccing a remote backup server |
| Previous Message | Dimitri Maziuk | 2018-07-24 17:22:24 | Re: logical replication snapshots |