Re: [PATCH] Add CANONICAL option to xmlserialize

From: Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add CANONICAL option to xmlserialize
Date: 2024-08-26 14:29:58
Message-ID: 61788beb-7bd4-4dd0-bad8-625c2826085f@uni-muenster.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 26.08.24 14:15, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I am not strongly against enhancing XMLSERIALIZE, but it can be nice
> to see some wider concept first. Currently the state looks just random
> - and I didn't see any serious discussion about implementation fo
> SQL/XML. We don't need to be necessarily compatible with Oracle, but
> it can help if we have a functionality that can be used for conversions.

Fair point. A road map definitely wouldn't hurt. Not quite sure how to
start this motion though :D
So far I've just picked the missing SQL/XML features that were listed in
the PostgreSQL todo list and that I need for any of my projects. But I
would gladly change the priorities if there is any interest in the
community for specific features.

--
Jim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-08-26 14:49:15 Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring
Previous Message Robert Haas 2024-08-26 14:24:57 Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring