| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Craig Sanders <cas(at)taz(dot)net(dot)au> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: (fwd) Problems with Postgres |
| Date: | 1999-08-10 21:21:47 |
| Message-ID: | 6175.934320107@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> This is where things are going wrong:
> the pg_vlock file gets deleted in vc_abort with this backtrace:
> (gdb) bt
> #0 vc_abort () at vacuum.c:252
> #1 0x8078f28 in TransactionIdAbort (transactionId=156164) at transam.c:578
> #2 0x80e0269 in XactLockTableWait (xid=156164) at lmgr.c:332
> #3 0x806c9a9 in heap_delete (relation=0x8216ac8, tid=0x8225c48, ctid=0x0) at heapam.c:1149
Ah-hah, I *knew* that code was bogus: TransactionIdAbort() has no
business calling vc_abort(). I fixed that about two days ago
in both current and REL6_5 branches...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 1999-08-10 21:32:52 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages |
| Previous Message | Oliver Elphick | 1999-08-10 19:42:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: (fwd) Problems with Postgres |