Re: Parallel CREATE INDEX for GIN indexes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel CREATE INDEX for GIN indexes
Date: 2025-03-09 22:23:49
Message-ID: 617145.1741559029@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> writes:
> On 3/9/25 17:38, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Coverity is a little unhappy about this business in
>> _gin_begin_parallel:

> I don't mind doing it differently, but this code is just a copy from
> _bt_begin_parallel. So how come coverity does not complain about that?
> Or is that whitelisted?

Ah. Most likely somebody dismissed it years ago. Given that
precedent, I'm content to dismiss this one too.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2025-03-09 22:27:53 Re: Parallel CREATE INDEX for GIN indexes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-03-09 22:19:49 Re: Printing window function OVER clauses in EXPLAIN