From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: savepoint name vs prepared transaction name |
Date: | 2009-10-16 14:38:52 |
Message-ID: | 6149.1255703932@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
=?UTF-8?Q?Grzegorz_Ja=C5=9Bkiewicz?= <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Is there any reason, why I can't put quotes around name of savepoint, but I
> have/can do this for prepare transaction ?
Savepoint names are identifiers; the SQL spec says so. Prepared
transaction GIDs are string literals. The relevant discussion
about that is here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-05/msg01292.php
We could conceivably allow an identifier too in PREPARE TRANSACTION,
but I think that that might be more dangerous than helpful, because
of the implicit case folding for identifiers. 'XX' and 'xx' are
distinct but XX and xx wouldn't be. There are a few other places
where we allow strings and identifiers interchangeably, but AFAIR
they are all places where case doesn't matter.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-10-16 14:42:28 | Re: Wrong estimation of rows for hash join |
Previous Message | Arnaud Lesauvage | 2009-10-16 13:30:23 | Re: pgsql2shp : Encoding headache |