Re: BUG #18663: synchronous_standby_names vs synchronous_commit vs pg_stat_replication

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: asphator(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #18663: synchronous_standby_names vs synchronous_commit vs pg_stat_replication
Date: 2025-01-09 00:35:39
Message-ID: 614200e4-9434-4aad-b44d-078bc6d5e65a@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 2024/10/21 18:43, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
> On 2024/10/18 23:48, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
>> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>>
>> Bug reference:      18663
>> Logged by:          Asphator
>> Email address:      asphator(at)gmail(dot)com
>> PostgreSQL version: 15.7
>> Operating system:   RHEL7+
>> Description:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> I would like to raise 2 issues:
>> - documentation issue
>> - pg_stat_replication view issue in a very specific use case
>>
>> 1. Documentation
>> Regarding parameter synchronous_standby_names, I did not manage to find
>> anything in documentation preventing from setting value 0. The only thing
>> I've found is a comment in a commit of 2016. Would be nice to mention in
>> documentation that value must be a "positive" integer.
>
> Agreed. I've attached the patch.

I made a slight wording adjustment.
Unless there are objections, I'll commit the attached patch.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-doc-Clarify-synchronous_standby_names-parameter.patch text/plain 1.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2025-01-09 03:30:43 Re: BUG #18764: server closed the connection unexpectedly
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-01-08 21:12:32 Re: BUG #18765: Inconsistent behaviour and errors with LIKE