Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash?

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash?
Date: 2024-01-19 21:38:33
Message-ID: 611843ead9b111c763420bd09bbcb4a330032f8b.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2024-01-19 at 14:27 +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> Pushed that way, thanks!

Thank you.

One post-commit question on 0aba255440: why do
haszero64(pg_bswap64(chunk)) rather than just haszero64(chunk)? How
does byteswapping affect whether a zero byte exists or not?

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2024-01-19 21:43:37 Re: index prefetching
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-01-19 21:22:09 Re: Patch: Improve Boolean Predicate JSON Path Docs