Re: State of pg_createsubscriber

From: "Euler Taveira" <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Euler Taveira" <euler(dot)taveira(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Subject: Re: State of pg_createsubscriber
Date: 2024-05-19 17:49:22
Message-ID: 61182a55-87e6-4019-9274-5f2cc5c38f31@app.fastmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, May 19, 2024, at 2:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm fairly disturbed about the readiness of pg_createsubscriber.
> The 040_pg_createsubscriber.pl TAP test is moderately unstable
> in the buildfarm [1], and there are various unaddressed complaints
> at the end of the patch thread (pretty much everything below [2]).
> I guess this is good enough to start beta with, but it's far from
> being good enough to ship, IMO. If there were active work going
> on to fix these things, I'd feel better, but neither the C code
> nor the test script have been touched since 1 April.

My bad. :( I'll post patches soon to address all of the points.

--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Benjamin 2024-05-19 18:07:22 Re: [PATCH] Avoid mixing custom and OpenSSL BIO functions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-05-19 17:30:17 State of pg_createsubscriber