| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ray Ontko <rayo(at)ontko(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Are statistics gathered on function indexes? |
| Date: | 2002-06-28 19:19:52 |
| Message-ID: | 6111.1025291992@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Ray Ontko <rayo(at)ontko(dot)com> writes:
>> It appears that "vacuum analyze verbose actor" causes the problem.
>> It appears that I have to say "vacuum analyze actor" in order to
>> clear out the ill effects of having said "vacuum analyze verbose actor".
I really, really doubt that "verbose" has anything to do with it.
What do you get from
select * from pg_stats where tablename = 'actor' and
attname = 'actor_full_name';
Do the results change significantly between the "good" state and the
"bad" state? How about the results of
select relpages, reltuples from pg_class where relname = 'actor';
It would seem that one or another of these statistical items is getting
set weirdly by something you are doing, but I have no idea what exactly
is going wrong...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ray Ontko | 2002-06-28 19:43:11 | Re: Are statistics gathered on function indexes? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-06-28 18:46:32 | Re: Are statistics gathered on function indexes? |