From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeremy Schneider <schneider(at)ardentperf(dot)com>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Sequence's value can be rollback after a crashed recovery. |
Date: | 2021-11-23 21:41:06 |
Message-ID: | 61104.1637703666@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> I wonder though if we shouldn't try to improve the existing text.
> The phrasing "never rolled back" seems like it's too easily
> misinterpreted. Maybe rewrite the <caution> block like
> ...
A bit of polishing later, maybe like the attached.
regards, tom lane
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
improve-nextval-docs.patch | text/x-diff | 2.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-11-23 21:43:25 | Re: pg_upgrade parallelism |
Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2021-11-23 21:37:34 | Re: pg_upgrade parallelism |