Re: PG-MQ?

From: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG-MQ?
Date: 2007-06-20 15:32:57
Message-ID: 60y7iebpzq.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

markokr(at)gmail(dot)com ("Marko Kreen") writes:
> To Chris: you should like PgQ, its just stored procs in database,
> plus it's basically just generalized Slony-I, with some optimizations,
> so should be familiar territory ;)

Looks interesting...

Random ideas
============
- insert_event in C (way to get rid of plpython)

Yeah, I'm with that... Ever tried building [foo] on AIX, where foo in
('perl', 'python', ...)??? :-(

It seems rather excessive to add in a whole stored procedure language
simply for one function...
--
(format nil "~S(at)~S" "cbbrowne" "linuxdatabases.info")
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/sgml.html
I always try to do things in chronological order.

In response to

  • Re: PG-MQ? at 2007-06-20 10:58:20 from Marko Kreen

Responses

  • Re: PG-MQ? at 2007-06-20 17:02:44 from Marko Kreen

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2007-06-20 16:34:21 Re: What does Page Layout version mean? (Was: Re: Reducing NUMERIC size for 8.3)
Previous Message Marko Kreen 2007-06-20 13:50:24 Re: PG-MQ?