From: | Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Change the name |
Date: | 2007-09-04 05:07:52 |
Message-ID: | 60wsv7vx07.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-de-allgemein |
scrappy(at)hub(dot)org ("Marc G. Fournier") writes:
> --On Monday, September 03, 2007 13:20:39 -0500 Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
> wrote:
>
>> Ok, well, at the least then we really need to focus discussion on
>> "Should we change the name" and quit worrying about how we'll actually
>> do it.
>
> The other option is that EDB creates a Postgres community, GPLs the code and
> puts it all into Subversion, and run it in parallel to the PostgreSQL community
> ... then everyone that wants to keep the status quo can stick around and
> continue marketing and pushing PostgreSQL, and those that "want change" can
> just move over to that new project ...
>
> Now, *that* would be an interesting experiment ...
Ah, and I think that represents an interesting gedanken experiment as
to what proposal for change will get the wildest responses.
I'd sum that one up in two words:
In
and
sane.
--
(format nil "~S(at)~S" "cbbrowne" "cbbrowne.com")
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/lisp.html
"Consistency is the single most important aspect of *ideology.*
Reality is not nearly so consistent." - <cbbrowne(at)hex(dot)net>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-09-04 07:42:01 | Re: Change the name (was: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)) |
Previous Message | Chris Browne | 2007-09-04 05:03:08 | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-09-04 07:42:01 | Re: Change the name (was: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)) |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2007-09-04 02:45:44 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |