| From: | Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: slru.c race condition |
| Date: | 2005-11-01 19:50:57 |
| Message-ID: | 60slug87vi.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com ("Jim C. Nasby") writes:
> AFAIK they're not using subtransactions at all, but I'll check.
Are they perchance using pl/PerlNG?
We discovered a problem with Slony-I's handling of subtransactions
which was exposed by pl/PerlNG, which evidently wraps its SPI calls
inside subtransactions.
For more details...
<http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/slony1/bugs/bugupdate.php?1293>
That is the only subtransaction issue I am aware of...
--
select 'cbbrowne' || '@' || 'acm.org';
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/nonrdbms.html
:FATAL ERROR -- ERROR IN ERROR HANDLER
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2005-11-01 20:37:55 | Re: 8.1 Release Candidate 1 Bundled ... |
| Previous Message | Chris Browne | 2005-11-01 19:41:44 | Re: slru.c race condition |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-11-01 21:22:17 | Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-01 19:43:35 | Re: Final cleanup of SQL:1999 references |