Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?

From: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?
Date: 2007-04-06 02:02:56
Message-ID: 60slbel0of.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

ler(at)lerctr(dot)org ("Larry Rosenman") writes:
> I might use that as the base then, since the hardware finishes getting here
> tomorrow.
>
> My question still stands on what OS's we need coverage for.

I've got Debian testing/unstable covered. I'm not sure we have
Novell/SuSE covered...
--
output = ("cbbrowne" "@" "linuxdatabases.info")
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/emacs.html
"Motto for a research laboratory: What we work on today, others will
first think of tomorrow." -- Alan J. Perlis

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2007-04-06 02:21:56 Re: pgbench transaction timestamps
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2007-04-06 00:17:51 Re: Bitmap index thoughts (another segfault)