Re: Are we mischaracterising mysql? Re: 12 Silver Bullets

From: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Are we mischaracterising mysql? Re: 12 Silver Bullets
Date: 2007-08-16 20:38:09
Message-ID: 60r6m3nrke.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

derek(dot)rodner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com ("Derek Rodner") writes:
> Ron,
>
> Talk about spin... I just read the Sabre case study that you pointed
> out. It is interesting how they portray it because I sat in a case
> study at Gartner's Open Source Summit that was given by the guys at
> Travelocity. What the case study DOESN'T tell you is that NONE of the
> transactions run through MySQL.
>
> The entire backend for actual transactions runs on Oracle. When you go
> to Travelocity and do all your searches, that is pulling data from
> MySQL. The MySQL data is updated from Oracle back end databases. When
> you decide to purchase, the system then switches to Oracle where all the
> real work happens. MySQL is used for read-only work at Sabre.

I was under the impression that IMS was still the primary database
system "of choice" for the high end OLTP work.

That was the case when I was there, and for that to have been dropped
would have required *much* louder trumpeting of change than I have
seen...
--
(reverse (concatenate 'string "moc.enworbbc" "@" "enworbbc"))
http://cbbrowne.com/info/multiplexor.html
"never post anything you don't want to see on your resume..."
-- Martin Minow <minow(at)pobox(dot)com>

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2007-08-16 22:32:50 Re: Are we mischaracterising mysql? Re: 12 Silver Bullets
Previous Message Chris Browne 2007-08-16 20:33:54 Re: DBA-Village Poll