From: | Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pl/pgsql list |
Date: | 2005-06-07 22:29:29 |
Message-ID: | 60psuxls1i.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
luckyratfoot(at)gmail(dot)com (Bob) writes:
> What are the opinions on a separate list just for pl/pgsql? Seems
> pl/pgsql deserves her own area. Just wondering if this would make
> sense, and if it did can we have a separate list?
I haven't been seeing so much traffic about pl/pgsql that it seems to
warrant a separate list.
If we were having to turn away pl/pgsql questions, I would easily
agree.
--
(format nil "~S(at)~S" "cbbrowne" "acm.org")
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/sap.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #78. "I will not tell my Legions of Terror
"And he must be taken alive!" The command will be: ``And try to take
him alive if it is reasonably practical.''"
<http://www.eviloverlord.com/>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ian Burrell | 2005-06-07 23:01:02 | Reliably finding temporary table |
Previous Message | Jim McMaster | 2005-06-07 22:20:38 | Cannot get PostgreSQL to work with Ruby On Rails |