Re: pl/pgsql list

From: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql list
Date: 2005-06-07 22:29:29
Message-ID: 60psuxls1i.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

luckyratfoot(at)gmail(dot)com (Bob) writes:
> What are the opinions on a separate list just for pl/pgsql?  Seems
> pl/pgsql deserves her own area. Just wondering if this would make
> sense, and if it did can we have a separate list?

I haven't been seeing so much traffic about pl/pgsql that it seems to
warrant a separate list.

If we were having to turn away pl/pgsql questions, I would easily
agree.
--
(format nil "~S(at)~S" "cbbrowne" "acm.org")
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/sap.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #78. "I will not tell my Legions of Terror
"And he must be taken alive!" The command will be: ``And try to take
him alive if it is reasonably practical.''"
<http://www.eviloverlord.com/>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Burrell 2005-06-07 23:01:02 Reliably finding temporary table
Previous Message Jim McMaster 2005-06-07 22:20:38 Cannot get PostgreSQL to work with Ruby On Rails