From: | Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: UltraSPARC versus AMD |
Date: | 2005-04-22 17:12:19 |
Message-ID: | 60ll7a20ss.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Richard_D_Levine(at)raytheon(dot)com writes:
> I just got done comparing SPECMarks (on spec.org) between Sun's AMD entry
> level servers versus similarly configured UltraSPARCs versus desktop AMD
> based machines. Sun's AMD machines are twice as fast as their UItraSPARCs,
> for approximately the same price. What a hoot.
It's not surprising.
The "interesting" efforts that Sun has been putting into CPUs lately
have gone into the new "Niagara" thing which isn't going into low end
UltraSPARCs.
AMD has gotten a lot of the ex-Digital folk, and ex-Alpha
technologies, and has been able to get that stuff into lower priced
systems, from whence is what we can see...
--
(format nil "~S(at)~S" "cbbrowne" "acm.org")
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/sap.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #78. "I will not tell my Legions of Terror
"And he must be taken alive!" The command will be: ``And try to take
him alive if it is reasonably practical.''"
<http://www.eviloverlord.com/>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dann Corbit | 2005-04-22 17:19:18 | Re: Postgresql Windows ODBC |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2005-04-22 17:07:05 | Re: Migrating MySQL app to postgres? |