| From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Some thoughts about i/o priorities and throttling vacuum |
| Date: | 2003-10-17 20:45:32 |
| Message-ID: | 60k773sidv.fsf@dev6.int.libertyrms.info |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com (Mike Mascari) writes:
> Greg Stark wrote:
>> Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)libertyrms(dot)info> writes:
>>>VACUUM is like putting an extra few transport trucks onto the
>>>highway. It may only go from one highway junction to the next, and
>>>be fairly brief, if traffic is moving well. But if traffic is
>>>heavy, it adds to the congestion. (And that's as far as the
>>>analogy can go; I can't imagine a way of drawing the GUC parameter
>>>into this...)
>>
>> Ooh strained metaphors. This game is always fun.
>>
>> So I think of it the other way around. A busy database is like
>> downtown traffic with everyone going every which way for short
>> trips. Running vacuum is like having a few trucks driving through
>> your city streets for through traffic.
>>
>> Having a parameter to slow down the through traffic is like, uh,
>> having express lanes for local traffic. er, yeah, that's the
>> ticket. Except who ever heard of having express lanes for local
>> traffic. Hm.
>
> All I know is that Jan Wieck would have each car filled to the brim
> with spikes....
No, you just need _one_ spike.
_One_ spike in the centre of the steering wheel.
There would be _so_ much less tailgating if they had those spikes...
--
"cbbrowne","@","libertyrms.info"
<http://dev6.int.libertyrms.com/>
Christopher Browne
(416) 646 3304 x124 (land)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2003-10-17 20:46:25 | Writers Wanted |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2003-10-17 20:22:53 | Vacuum thoughts |