Re: Some thoughts about i/o priorities and throttling vacuum

From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Some thoughts about i/o priorities and throttling vacuum
Date: 2003-10-17 20:45:32
Message-ID: 60k773sidv.fsf@dev6.int.libertyrms.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com (Mike Mascari) writes:
> Greg Stark wrote:
>> Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)libertyrms(dot)info> writes:
>>>VACUUM is like putting an extra few transport trucks onto the
>>>highway. It may only go from one highway junction to the next, and
>>>be fairly brief, if traffic is moving well. But if traffic is
>>>heavy, it adds to the congestion. (And that's as far as the
>>>analogy can go; I can't imagine a way of drawing the GUC parameter
>>>into this...)
>>
>> Ooh strained metaphors. This game is always fun.
>>
>> So I think of it the other way around. A busy database is like
>> downtown traffic with everyone going every which way for short
>> trips. Running vacuum is like having a few trucks driving through
>> your city streets for through traffic.
>>
>> Having a parameter to slow down the through traffic is like, uh,
>> having express lanes for local traffic. er, yeah, that's the
>> ticket. Except who ever heard of having express lanes for local
>> traffic. Hm.
>
> All I know is that Jan Wieck would have each car filled to the brim
> with spikes....

No, you just need _one_ spike.

_One_ spike in the centre of the steering wheel.

There would be _so_ much less tailgating if they had those spikes...
--
"cbbrowne","@","libertyrms.info"
<http://dev6.int.libertyrms.com/>
Christopher Browne
(416) 646 3304 x124 (land)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2003-10-17 20:46:25 Writers Wanted
Previous Message Greg Stark 2003-10-17 20:22:53 Vacuum thoughts