Re: background triggers?

From: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: background triggers?
Date: 2006-05-24 14:44:45
Message-ID: 60k68b5voi.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Sim Zacks <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il> writes:
> The reason why the client application would have to wait is because
> the front-end is written in MSAccess. While Windows supports multi
> threading, Access does not support multi threading.
> (Multi threading allows background processing, IYDK)

Well, you *clearly* need to have some sort of "daemon" running in
order to do this.

I expect it will in effect be a LISTEN process that waits for clients
to submit NOTIFY requests.

Even if you don't actually choose to use NOTIFY/LISTEN, per se, you'll
doubtless wind up creating an ad hoc, informally-specified
implementation of part of it...
--
let name="cbbrowne" and tld="ntlug.org" in name ^ "@" ^ tld;;
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/unix.html
"Any sufficiently complicated C or Fortran program contains an ad hoc
informally-specified bug-ridden slow implementation of half of Common
Lisp." -- Philip Greenspun

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alban Hertroys 2006-05-24 14:48:10 Re: [SQL] (Ab)Using schemas and inheritance
Previous Message Sim Zacks 2006-05-24 14:04:00 Re: background triggers?