Re: Postgresql replication

From: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql replication
Date: 2005-08-25 16:18:55
Message-ID: 60irxung5s.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

aly(dot)dharshi(at)telus(dot)net (Aly Dharshi) writes:
> I know I am wadding into this discussion as an beginner compared to
> the rest who have answered this thread, but doesn't something like
> pgpool provide relief for pseudo-multimaster replication, and what
> about software like sqlrelay wouldn't these suites help to some extent
> ? Looking forward to be enlightened.

pgpool and sqlrelay provide you a loose equivalent to synchronous
replication, as they have to submit the queries to *all* of the nodes.

If you can live with the long latency times that result if the nodes
are widely separated, that's great.

Unfortunately, the reason for people to want *asynchronous*
multimaster replication is that they /cannot/ afford that latency
time. They want to submit updates only to the local database, and
have the updates head to the other server some time later.

That's why pgpool/sqlrelay aren't an answer.
--
output = ("cbbrowne" "@" "acm.org")
http://cbbrowne.com/info/languages.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #46. "If an advisor says to me "My liege,
he is but one man. What can one man possibly do?", I will reply
"This." and kill the advisor." <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Browne 2005-08-25 16:20:52 Re: Postgresql replication
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-08-25 16:14:31 Re: Help with a subselect inside a view