Re: prelimiary performance comparison pgsql vs mysql

From: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: prelimiary performance comparison pgsql vs mysql
Date: 2005-03-14 23:04:01
Message-ID: 60hdjdvnha.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

mrae(at)purplebat(dot)com (Mark Rae) writes:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 06:52:58AM -0500, Rick Schumeyer wrote:
>> Below are some PRELIMINARY results in comparing the performance of pgsql and
>> mysql.
>> ...
>> I have not yet done any testing of transactions, multiple concurrent
>> processes, etc.
>>
>
> I would say that doing the concurrency tests is probably the most
> important factor in comparing other databases against MySQL, as
> MySQL will almost always win in single-user tests.
>
> E.g. here are some performance figures from tests I have done in the past.
> This is with a 6GB databse on a 4CPU Itanium system running a mixture of
> read-only queries, but it is fairly typical of the behaviour I have seen.
> The Oracle figures also scaled in a similar way to postgres.
>
> Clients 1 2 3 4 6 8 12 16 32 64 128
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> mysql-4.1.1 1.00 1.41 1.34 1.16 0.93 1.03 1.01 1.00 0.94 0.86 0.80
> pg-7.4.1 0.65 1.27 1.90 2.48 2.45 2.50 2.48 2.51 2.49 2.39 2.38

Could you elaborate on what the measures are here? I don't quite
follow what "0.8" means as compared to "2.38."
--
let name="cbbrowne" and tld="cbbrowne.com" in String.concat "@" [name;tld];;
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/linuxxian.html
A VAX is virtually a computer, but not quite.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vanole, Mike 2005-03-14 23:07:09 Multi Time Zone Select
Previous Message Miroslav Šulc 2005-03-14 22:54:54 Re: Problem with special character � on