Re: PostgreSQL derivatives

From: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL derivatives
Date: 2008-06-06 21:16:40
Message-ID: 60fxrqmfgn.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net (Robert Treat) writes:
> But there isn't any floss software actually being shipped right?
> License/code wise truviso and netezza are basically the same in that
> respect, even if technologically truviso values postgres
> compatability higher, but there is no floss distributing occuring,
> right?

I was under the impression that there were some commits to HEAD that
had been sponsored by Truviso.

If that be the case, I'd expect there to be some commits, probably
somewhere around April, when the press release took place, that we
could point to.
--
select 'cbbrowne' || '@' || 'cbbrowne.com';
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/unix.html
Did you hear about the dyslexic agnostic insomniac who stays up all
night wondering if there really is a Dog?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Seth Grimes 2008-06-06 22:26:45 Re: PostgreSQL derivatives
Previous Message Robert Treat 2008-06-06 21:16:13 Re: PostgreSQL derivatives